Overblog
Suivre ce blog
Editer l'article Administration Créer mon blog

  • : Forces of valor
  • Forces of valor
  • : Diecast-metal military forces of valor . Military toys,scales 1/16,1/32,1/43,1/60 1/72. Action Figures DRAGON 1/6 ,BBI 1/6.HISTORY,VIDEOS,
  • Contact

Visitors online


Search

Translation

Support

 


usmcsmall.png

Memorial

memorial.png


IRAQ
AFGHANISTAN

Untitled 

VIETNAM
Untitled
WW2
Untitled
KOREA

Untitled
WW1
Untitled

COMMONWEALTH 
Untitled
FRANCE
Untitled

9/11
Untitled
911m.png

Models

Page rank

Resultat test PageRank

8 mai 2007 2 08 /05 /mai /2007 09:01

allemagne.jpg

 

German King Tiger
-Battle of Germany-

SKN: 80201 | SCALE: 1:32

a.jpg      

PzKpfw VI Ausf. B, Tiger II 

Tiger II is the common name of a a German heavy tank of the Second World War. The official German designation was Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. B and the tank also had the ordnance inventory designation SdKfz 182. It is also known under the informal name Königstiger (German: Bengal Tiger), often literally translated as King Tiger and by the British as Royal Tiger.

The Tiger II combined the heavy armor of the Tiger I with the sloped armor of the Panther. The design followed the same concept as the Tiger I, but was intended to be even more formidable. The Tiger II chassis supplied the basis for the Jagdtiger turretless tank destroyer. The Tiger II weighed 68.5 (early turret) to 69.8 (production turret) tonnes, was protected by 150 to 180 mm of frontal armor, and was armed with the 88 mm KwK 43 L/71 gun.

The very heavy armor and powerful long-range gun gave the Tiger II the advantage against virtually all opposing tanks. This was especially true on the Western Front, where the British and U.S. forces had almost no heavy tanks with which to oppose it. In a defensive position it was difficult to destroy. Offensively it performed with less success, and its performance was a great disappointment to Hitler[citation needed] when it first saw action.

The Tiger II performed very well against Allied and Soviet tanks being able to penetrate the front armour of the M4 Sherman, M26 Pershing and IS-2 at respectively 2500 m, 1800 m and 1200 m. Defensewise the M4 Sherman was unable to penetrate the front even at point blank and the M26 Pershing and IS-2 had to come within 1300 m and 200 m respectively.

The Tiger II was widely photographed due to its large size and propaganda value.

Development

Initially two designs were provided, one by Henschel and one by Porsche. Both used a turret design from Krupp; the main differences were in the hull design, transmission and suspension.

The Henschel version used a conventional hull design with sloped armor resembling the layout of the Panther tank. It had a rear mounted engine and standard interleaved road wheels mounted on transverse torsion bars in a similar manner to the original Tiger. To simplify maintenance, however, the wheels were overlapping rather than interleaved as in the Tiger I.

The Porsche hull design had a rear-mounted turret and a mid mounted engine. The suspension was the same as on the Jagdpanzer Elefant. This suspension had six road wheels per side mounted in paired bogies sprung with short longitudinal torsion bars that were integral to the wheel pair; this saved internal space and facilitated repairs. The Porsche version had a series-hybrid power system where the gasoline engines powered electrical generators which in turned powered electric motors which turned the sprockets. This method of propulsion had been attempted before on the Ferdinand prototypes and in some U.S. designs, but had never been put into production. The Porsche suspension would later be used on a few of the later Jagdtiger tank hunters.

 

  henschel-turret.gif

tigeri6.jpg

                                                                              PORSCHE TURRET /1
                     HENSCHEL TURRET /2


Henschel won the contract, and all Tiger IIs were produced by the firm. Two turret designs were used in production vehicles. The initial design is sometimes misleadingly called the "Porsche turret" due to the belief that it was designed by Porsche for their prototype. In fact this turret was simply the initial Krupp design for both prototypes. This turret had a rounded front and steeply sloped sides, with a difficult-to-manufacture curved bulge to accommodate the commander's cupola. Fifty early turrets were mounted to Henschel's hull and used in action. The more common "production" turret, sometimes called the "Henschel" turret, was simplified with a flat face, no shot trap (created by the curved face of the initial-type turret), less-steeply sloped sides, and no bulge for the commander's cupola.

The track system used on the Tiger II chassis was a unique one, which used alternating "contact shoe" and "connector" links—the contact shoe link had a pair of transverse metal bars that contacted the ground, while the connector links had no contact with the ground.

The Tiger II was developed late in the war and made in relatively small numbers. Like all German tanks, it had a gasoline engine. However, this same engine powered the much lighter Panther and Tiger I tanks. The Tiger II was under-powered, like many heavy tanks of WW2, and consumed a lot of fuel which was already in short supply.

 Mechanical problems

With the Third Reich hard pressed, the Tiger IIs were sent directly from the factories into combat. As a result of the abandonment of post-production testing and preliminary trials, the tanks had numerous technical issues. Notably, the steering control would often break down under the stress of the vehicle's weight. In addition, not only were the engines prone to overheating and failure, but they also consumed large amounts of fuel. This can be attributed to the fact that it used the 690 hp Maybach engine of the far smaller Panther tank. The engine had to constantly run at full power just to get the tank moving. Henschel & Son's chief designer Erwin Adlers explained that "The breakdowns can be attributed to the fact that the Tiger II had to go straight into series production without the benefit of test results." The engine and drivetrain was overburdened by the weight and would have required more testing to work out problems, a common problem among heavy tanks that pushed the limits of powerplants and transmissions. A version of the Maybach HL230 engine with direct fuel injection was being designed that would have improved power to about 1,000 PS (986 hp, 736 kW), Henschel proposed to use it for future production and retrofitting to existing Tiger IIs, but the deteriorating war situation meant the upgrade never left the drawing board. Other suggested improvements included a new main weapon, possibly of 105 mm calibre, but again this never got beyond the proposal stage.

Overall, the Tiger II was a formidable tank in spite of its problems. The Tiger II's 88 mm armament could destroy most Allied armoured fighting vehicles at a range far outside the effective range of the enemy AFV's armament. Also, notwithstanding its reliability problems, the Tiger II was remarkably agile for such a heavy vehicle. Contemporary German records indicate that it had a lower ground pressure and was as maneuverable as the much lighter Panzer IV. Also, like the Tiger I, its sophisticated suspension design provided excellent flotation, giving the tank a very smooth ride and making it an excellent gun platform. The tank's reputation as an unreliable, underpowered, and overly complex system is based on postwar testing of captured examples by the U.S. Army's ordnance branch.

 Production

1,500 Tiger II were ordered, but total production reached only 487 units (1943 - 3, 1944 - 377, and 1945 - 107 produced). Full production ran from early-1944 to the end of the war.

Combat history

The first use of the Tiger II in combat was in Normandy on 18 July 1944 with the 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion (schwere Panzerabteilung 503). It was first used on the Eastern Front on 12 August 1944 with schwere PzAbt 501 in the fighting at the Soviets' Baranov bridgehead over the Vistula River. In this action, a single Soviet T-34-85 under the command of Guards Lieutenant Os'kin from the 53rd Guards Tank Brigade knocked out three Tiger IIs by firing at their sides from an ambush position. Later the Tiger II was present at, among others, the Ardennes Offensive, the Soviet offensive into Poland and East Prussia in January 1945, the German offensives in Hungary in 1945, fighting to the east of Berlin at the Seelow Heights in April 1945 and finally within the city of Berlin itself at the very end of the war. 
The Sherman-equipped 4th/7th Royal Dragoon Guards claim they were the first British regiment to knock out a King Tiger, on 8 August 1944, in France.

 Soviet wartime testing of the Tiger II

During August 1944, a number of Tiger IIs were captured by the Soviets near Sandomierz and were soon tested by the Soviets at their testing grounds at Kubinka [1]. The tests revealed the tanks to be severely defective; the transmission and suspension broke down very frequently and the engine was prone to overheating and consequential failure. Additionally, the Soviets discovered surprising deficiencies in its armour. Not only was the metal of shoddy quality (a problem not peculiar to the Tiger II—as the war progressed the Germans found it harder and harder to obtain the alloys needed for high quality steel) but the welding was also, despite "careful workmanship", extremely poor. As a result, even when shells did not penetrate its armour the spalling was horrid and the armour plating unfailingly cracked at the welding seams when struck by heavier shells, rendering the tank inoperable. The testers concluded that the Tiger II posed a lesser challenge than the much lighter and cheaper Tiger I, and were puzzled at the German decision to produce it.

There has been a lot of debate about the validity of these Russian tests. They were carried out by firing a large number of shots at very close range (each penetration weakens the armor so further penetrations become more likely) on a sample of only one tank. Additionally, the Russians had no means of correctly maintaining the tank's transmission—bearing in mind that the Germans found keeping the Tiger II in full working order logistically demanding, it is unsurprising that any captured examples quickly broke down without access to proper spare parts. In any event, when the King Tiger could be deployed in a defensive role it was usually successful against Soviet armor; for example, sSSPzAbt 503 scored approximately 500 kills in the period January–April 1945 on the Eastern Front, for the loss of 45 King Tigers (most of which were abandoned and destroyed by their own crews after mechanical breakdown or due to lack of fuel)(source: Sledgehammers, Strengths and Flaws of Tiger Tank Battalions in World War II, by C Wilbeck).

 Surviving vehicles

The fates of some of the tanks.

  • #102 - captured at Ogledow by Soviets; taken to Kubinka and used for target tests.
  • #104 - with SS-PzAbt 501. Knocked out near Beauvais by Sergeant Roberts of A Squadron, 23rd Hussars. On display at Shrivenham England.
  • #213 - abandoned during Battle of the Bulge. Survived and is on display outside of the La Gleize Museum in Belgium
  • #234 - captured at Ogledow. Used for spare parts for #102 and #502
  • #332 - abandoned near Trois Ponts, captured by US Army on 24 December 1944. Later moved to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Eventually transferred to Patton Museum, Kentucky.
  • #002 (#502) - captured at Ogledow by Soviets, eastern front. Survived and is on display at Kubinka Tank Museum

 

 

 

 

GENERAL DATA
Formal Designation(s) Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. B, Tiger II (SdKfz 182), Königstiger, VK4503
Manufacturer(s) Henschel
Production Quantity 489 Production Period Jan. 1944 - Mar. 1945
Type Heavy Tank Crew 5
Length /hull (m) 10.3 Barrel Overhang (m) 3.00
Width /with skirts (m) 3.76 Height (m) 3.08
Combat Weight (kg) 70000 Radio Equipment FuG5
FIREPOWER
Primary Armament 88mm KwK 43 L/71 Ammunition Carried 72
Traverse (degrees) Hydraulic (360°) Elevation (degrees) -7.4° to +15°
Traverse speed (360°) n.a. Sight TZF9b, later TZF9d
Secondary Armament 2 x 7.92 mm MG34 (coaxial, bow) Ammunition Carried 5850

MOBILITY CHARACTERISTICS
Engine Make & Model Maybach HL230P30 Track Links 96/track
Type & Displacement V12, 23.9 liters Track Width 80 cm
Horsepower (max.)

700hp@3000rpm

Track Ground Contact 413 cm
Power/Weight Ratio 10.0 hp/tonne Ground Pressure 13.7 psi
Gearbox 8 forward, 4 reverse Ground Clearance (m) 0.49
Fuel Gasoline (Petrol) Turning Radius (m) 4.8
Range on/off road (km) 170/120 Gradient (degrees) 35°
Mileage (liters/100km) 601 on/863 off road Vertical Obstacle (m) 0.85
Fuel Capacity (liters) 1036 Fording (m) 1.63
Speed on/off road 35-42/14-30 km/h Trench Crossing (m) 3.00
ARMOR PROTECTION
Armor Detail Front Side Rear Top/Bottom
Hull 100mm@40° 80mm@90° 80mm@60° 25-40mm@0°
Superstructure 150mm@40° 80mm@65° - 40mm@0°
Turret 180mm@81° 80mm@69° 80mm@69° 40mm@0-12°
Mantlet 100mm@Saukopf - - -


   

undefined

Partager cet article

commentaires